Edward Wong – NY Times.com
In a vacuum, power is something so many and too many with different ideas about how something should be; fight for. Moktada al-sadr is one of those people. Where he is interested in an
Like our Democrat leadership, although much less interested in an American defeat, a senior Iraqi official said of al-sadr:
“Mr. Sadr’s thinking was in constant evolution, groping for a workable strategy for the war.”
From the NY Times:
“Perhaps nothing is more surprising than the fact that Mr. Sadr’s attitude toward the Americans actually reflects a degree of ambivalence.”
“Anti-Americanism is the basis of his unflagging popularity. More than any other Iraqi politician, he is willing to recognize, validate and capitalize on the refusal of large segments of the Shiite population, especially the poor and dispossessed, to buy into any government that has the support of the Americans. It is one of the most vexing problems for the Americans, since President Bush’s whole strategy rests on the premise that formerly oppressed Shiites will work with the Americans.”
Every action or inaction has a reaction. The Democrats, al-sadr and others will play the necessary games in the hopes of keeping their heads above water. All rely on a certain anti-Americanism that has its present benefits, but has repercussions down the road.
Al-sadr would likely not care either way what happens to the
The Democrats have somehow managed to make a

Excellent post, BU.
ReplyDeleteI don't think the supporters of al-Sadr, mainly the dispossessed and poor, define the Shiite mentality toward Americans.
There are many historical evidences that the marginal and isolated social groups, the kind supports al-Sadr, will not play any important political role in the future of Iraq.
It is hardly surprising that he needs to wait American's departure before he could begin his political enterprise of terrorizing the entire Iraq.
Thanks for reading the NYT, so I don't have to! ;)
ReplyDelete