"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
------------------------------------------------
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell
------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

CNN.com - Poll:�Fifth of Americans�think calls�have been monitored - Feb 14, 2006

CNN.com - Poll:�Fifth of Americans�think calls�have been monitored - Feb 14, 2006

Another poll related article...it really isn't a slow news day if you open your eyes.

21% said, " it was very likely or somewhat likely their conversations had been wiretapped." Well there you have it. The 21% isn't even sure whether or not it is Very or Somewhat likely

"Shortly after 9/11, President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to conduct electronic surveillance of communications -- phone calls, e-mails and text messages -- between people inside the United States, including Americans, or what could be Americans if you consider the scope of cellphone technology or could be an American as a cellphone number does not designate citizenship and terrorist suspects overseas, bypassing a secret court set up to provide warrants for such surveillance," when the "secret courts" (could they mean FISA? ooooooh, sshhhh), scope would not fulfill the pressing need of a new reality.

As to whether the president broke the law and we Americans are not sure, the msm could go along way toward helping us decipher it, rather than toeing a self-imposed line.

 

© blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks