"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
------------------------------------------------
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell
------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

CNN.com - Huffington apologizes for Clooney 'blog' - Mar 22, 2006

CNN.com - Huffington apologizes for Clooney 'blog' - Mar 22, 2006

I had previously posted regarding the "error," however the intent of the post had nothing to do with what Huffington is apologizing for; it was just a good opening since what I was posting about was Clooney (here).

I still don't care about this, but am confused as to what this means? "Huffington acknowledged on her Web site Saturday that she was "blinded" to the issue of assembling a blog in which the source of the material wasn't clear, as was the case with Clooney."

I don't understand what she means by "blinded." This was also a "major lesson learned" for her.

Doesn't this kind of sound like a "politicians" apology? Again, I'm not too big on caring about this but, it seems to be the same double-standard that she and her "kind" would rant about. Will Maureen Dowd be defending her sometime soon? I hope so.

 

© blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks