I don't speak Spanish. I speak English. Fine, don't try to read anything Spanish; no problem. However, I do have a problem reading English and understanding what is being reported, if the media does not term something correctly.
Is this article a case of laziness or intentional? Has the L.A. Times finally made the full crossover from referring to "illegal immigrants" as just "immigrants?" I don't know. But I should be able to read an article and know for sure by the end of it. Am I missing something?
I'm definately being a little simple minded here, but the concern is real.
The L.A. Times says:
"Though it goes against the conventional wisdom of anti-illegal immigration supporters, those who enroll the poor in the federal food stamp program say they've struggled for years to get immigrant Latino families signed up.Normally, perhaps in a different environment/era, I wouldn't wonder whether the "struggle" to reach Latino families included all regardless of status or whether these were "legal" immigrants they are referring to.
Now a Spanish-language news report and television ad campaign have spurred thousands of immigrants in Orange County over the last several weeks to contact a nonprofit organization that offers a Spanish-language class called "Food Stamps in Four Hours."
Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minutemen told the L.A. Times:
(These immigrants and their children) "should only be given life-saving medical care."That's a good question, as it strikes me that this is one of those opportunities for muddying the system further.
"If we encourage illegal alien families to come forward and exploit the … system, aren't we encouraging more illegal immigration? We have to cut these benefits off."
The Community Action Partnership's outreach coordinator, Alfonso Chavez said:
"The Mexican man is macho. He doesn't want to come to this country and beg. I tell them this is a program that will help the children. The kids are American-born, and they have a right to this program."What kids are "American-born?" Who is Mr. Chavez referring to? Is he one of those people that feels it's a "right" for everyone regardless of status?
Mexican Consul Luis Miguel Ortiz Haro, who appeared in the PSA on KMEX channel 34 said:
"This program is not welfare. It won't affect your immigration status. The program is a right, and if we don't use it, it's a privilege that will pass you by."Who is "we?" Is this a privilege and a right for all regardless of status?
Maybe everyone the article is referring to is a legal immigrant/citizen, but who knows for sure beyond the author and those involved and that's the problem.
The CAII front is a wee bit quiet at this moment, but here are some recent posts from members:
Debbie at Right Truth rightly suggests that we, Know the enemy within our borders