From the NY Times:
"WASHINGTON, Nov. 14 — One of the most resonant arguments in the debate over Iraq holds that the United States can move forward by pulling its troops back, as part of a phased withdrawal. If American troops begin to leave and the remaining forces assume a more limited role, the argument holds, it will galvanize the Iraqi government to assume more responsibility for securing and rebuilding Iraq."Interesting that now after the elections the NY Times hears voices saying "cut and run" wouldn't cut it. Interesting that it says, this is NOW being argued by many Dems, since this is nothing new from them.
"This is the case now being argued by many Democrats, most notably Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the incoming chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, who asserts that the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq should begin within four to six months."
Interesting how vision and reporting change with the change in seating in D.C.
It couldn't be more blatant.
