Yeah, it’s true I guess at least according to Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat (oddly) from the great state of
According to Reed who just happened to arrive back from a trip to
Reed put together some thoughts based on these “impressions,” that give one the “impression” that no matter what Petreus said would fully fit in with Reed’s “impressions.”
Said Reed:
"The prospect of anything changing over the next several weeks or months, certainly through September, are very bleak indeed."
As a result of Reed’s “impression:”
"We're ready, I think, for a vote on the policy. I don't think we have to wait."
It is my “impression” that direction, “impression” and “appearances” suggested to Reed to use friendly terminology by saying that Petraeus “appeared eager to come out with new ways to respond to the continuing security problems there” as a means to bolster the “cut and run somewhere” argument.
This is by means of giving the “impression” that Petraeus wants out; not that Petraeus has on the ground ideas to improve tactics in the mission based on the daily tide in battle.
Marking and assisting in the murky “impression” that Senator Reed would like to provide comes this sinister “impression:”
“"I got the impression from Gen. Petraeus that he wasn't waiting. Now he might be overruled by people in the White House and, you know, wait until September. But he seemed very eager to come forward as quickly as possible with a new direction and policy."
While we’re at it, let’s decide on the next six presidents that way we can get onto the more pressing issues of 2031__________________
Did you know:
Now, feelings have entered the equation....."
Trackposted to Outside the Beltway, Perri Nelson's Website, Right Celebrity, third world county, Jeanette's Celebrity Corner, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Webloggin, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, Conservative Cat, Conservative Thoughts, and Public Eye, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
|