You need to have "Time Select" for a Krugman "offending Opinion piece," but the link headline at NYT says alot about its likely weakness: "Krugman: Media Imbalance"
Click on the link and you get this line: "There's nothing bipartisan about the tale of Jack Abramoff, which is all about the use and abuse of Republican connections."
Yeah, ok, ignore a little more for us and write about it, ok?
I don't think the NYT is very wise to charge for offal from the likes of Krugman and Dowd among others.
"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Monday, January 30, 2006
The New York Times - Paul Krugman
Posted by a.k.a. Blandly Urbane at 12:10:00 PM
The New York Times - Paul Krugman
2006-01-30T12:10:00-07:00
a.k.a. Blandly Urbane
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
