"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

FM spokesman: US against any agreement between Iran, other parties - Irna

FM spokesman: US against any agreement between Iran, other parties - Irna: "Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said here Tuesday that recent propaganda campaign along with allegations made by a number of American officials explicitly indicate that Washington is against any agreement between Iran and other negotiators."

Which, no doubt would include things like, according to Rumsfeld, "Iran was sending '"Iranian Quds-force type people," or a division of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, into Iraq."They're currently putting people into Iraq to do things that are harmful to the future of Iraq," he said. "And we know it. And it is something that they, I think, will look back on as having been an error in judgment."'

Reza also said, '"Whenever the Americans feel there may be any chance for agreement between Iran, IAEA, Russia or other countries, they try to destroy it."'

This is, according to Iran the whole problem.

Iran insists that the "IAEA Board of Governors to safeguard its dignity in a bid to avoid facing the fate of certain other international organizations." As this would suit them just fine considering recent remarks by Mohammed ElBaradei as he is very "hopeful."

Who that might have learned some key lessons from Iraq would not want the U.N. on their side working feverishly...


© blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks