"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell

Friday, August 24, 2007

Hillary Clinton is an Evil Political Machine

From the NY Post:

"It's a horrible prospect to ask yourself, 'What if? What if?' But if certain things happen between now and the election, particularly with respect to terrorism, that will automatically give the Republicans an advantage again, no matter how badly they have mishandled it, no matter how much more dangerous they have made the world," Clinton told supporters in Concord."
Wouldn't it be great, if as "horrible" a prospect as it would be, if our issues with terror organizations wasn't just a political football? Wouldn't it be great if the terrorists were the bad guys?

The Democrat party and it's politicians disgust me to no end. So not only would good news from Iraq be bad for their party's prospects; a terror attack would be too. Not because it's a worthless party on defense, oh no...

I don't doubt for a second that this political beast that is Hillary Clinton could care less about an attack with the exception being that it might deny her the office she has coveted for likely more than two decades.

Trackback: http://haloscan.com/tb/blandlyurbane/8726222090713667634

  • DeMediacratic Nation Blogrolls

    Please give this Post/Blog a Vote - Top Blogs

    © blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks