"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
------------------------------------------------
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell
------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

McCain's Judgement "Dangerous" According to Slow Joe

Who cares what Senator Biden thinks regarding foreign affairs, especially if it happens to be about who was/is right and who was/is wrong. Mr. Biden is quoted at CNN.com as saying:

"we cannot afford a commander in chief who's divorced from reality and from America's most basic national interests"
"Divorced from reality?" He has to be kidding. Additionally, the man said:
"John McCain's the only one who doesn't get it."
Exsqueeze me? Twisting it here, but if Biden is the correct one, he's wrong that McCain is the "only one who doesn't get it." There are a couple more of us dunderheads out there. Talk about being divorced from reality (again, setting aside anything the man or his Presidential nominee say)

Here's some top-notch (ass)crack reporting:
"Once he became a U.S. senator, Obama voted for a war spending bill that would have withdrawn most U.S. troops by March 2008 and had once called for troop withdrawals to begin by the end of 2006."
Huh? Wha? What does this mean? Is this a was for, before being against something? This isn't one of the candidates saying this, this is a media fount making this statement. In the bag? You bet.

  • DeMediacratic Nation Blogrolls

  •  

    © blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks