"How did it come to pass that an opposition's measure of a president's foreign policy was all or nothing, success or "failure"? The answer is that the political absolutism now normal in Washington arrived at the moment--Nov. 7, 2000--that our politics subordinated even a war against terror to seizing the office of the presidency." - Daniel Henninger - WSJ 11/18/05
------------------------------------------------
"the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts." - George Orwell
------------------------------------------------

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Bush Personally Opening Mail!!! Wins Someone elses Publishers Clearing House Prize!

The twists and turns of the Left, led by none other than Kos, find the recent revelation regarding President Bush's signing statement to the "Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act;" which allow for warrantless searches/reading of mail.

Kos and his ilk find this to be yet another extra-Constitutional move on the administrations part:

"Every day the next two years will be a "Constitutional crisis" given we have a president who doesn't give a damn about the Constitution."

The Presidents signing statement allowed for, as an exception that "provides for opening of an item of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection in a manner consistent ... with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances."

What if concerns are great, but politicians and the ludicrous would rather prevent anything of a productive nature, as it always revolves around the fact that experts have said:

"the new powers could be easily abused and used to vacuum up large amounts of mail."

As I said, "possible abuse" is nothing to snort at, but I think it's about time that we seriously considered opening our eyes to the world rather than rely upon the eyes of the media and other news makers.

In closing, Kos says what I find to be an example of his and their twisted existence:

"Of course, it's the modern Republican Party at work -- big government, intrusive, dismissive of personal liberties. It's the nanny state on steroids. I suppose we shouldn't expect any less."
The parties in this country (any country for that matter) are an interesting species. I would be lying if I said the Republican party was not a little bit screwed up in the Conservative sense. But "big government, intrusive, dismissive of personal liberties. It's the nanny state on steroids..." is a description of the Democratic party and they haven't changed, at least for the better.

Why take anything they say seriously; it's all made up in their minds.

 

© blogger templates 3 column | Webtalks